| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Gallente ships are not what they used to be. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Fixing (ie. changing) Information Warfare Links is what would fix the Eos. I could care less if it had more drone bay if its links were actually any sort of useful. But any change would be a step in the right direction I suppose. But please fix th...
- by Air Scare - at 2009.11.04 19:17:00
|
2. Who is the best Solo PVP'R on EVE? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Nubs. Farjung.
- by Air Scare - at 2009.10.30 00:53:00
|
3. Astarte or Proteus? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: 1nsan1ty Edited by: 1nsan1ty on 22/10/2009 14:37:58 Found this one.. [New Setup 1] 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Amarr Navy Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane Amarr Navy Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane Dama...
- by Air Scare - at 2009.10.23 03:08:00
|
4. Deimos change on SISI - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
This is not a good change. Im actually pretty upset that this is even being considered. But alas, I want my opinion to matter so I wont go off on a tangent about lack of logic surrounding this change. Theres no reason. Show me one whine/nerf/com...
- by Air Scare - at 2008.02.04 06:47:00
|
5. CCP you ruined Gallente recons - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Damps were overpowered and needed nerfing. Fine. But gallente recons were not overpowered pre-Trinity. Everyone agreed with that. Lets not bring in other races recons. Therefore why not adjust the gallente recon bonus to make up for the differ...
- by Air Scare - at 2007.12.20 04:16:00
|
6. ISHTAR (non nano) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Ishtar can fit an excellent tank if you want it to. I like having a mwd so mine is something like this - mids: 1x MWD, 1x Capbooster, 3x whatever lows: 2x T2 Medium Reps, 1x Explosive, 1x Damage Control, 1x Energized adaptive I don't have anyt...
- by Air Scare - at 2007.12.18 19:51:00
|
7. Claymore - nano gang support - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Air Scare on 18/12/2007 07:24:49 As the constructive fellow above me posted, cap will be an issue with that setup. The warfare links alone will use lots of cap. If you start up that MWD or Shield booster your cap will die very qui...
- by Air Scare - at 2007.12.18 07:25:00
|
8. [TRI] Sleipnir (Small Gang PvP Fit) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Looks pretty solid to me. Only thing I *might change would be switching the nos for a skirmish warfare link, to help out out your gang. Would depend on the makeup of your gang and how tight your fitting req's are, but other than that thumbs up.
- by Air Scare - at 2007.12.14 04:43:00
|
9. Thank you, CCP. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I agree with most of whats said here. Great patch overall, and despite the few problems it will be cool. New ideas are always controversial. I would say with a bit more refining these changes will really shine. I dont see why people insist on ...
- by Air Scare - at 2007.12.10 01:41:00
|
10. Boot.ini jokes, Funny Cartoons, things to help the pain it caused - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Props to whoever posted - "ITS A TRAP!" on the first page of the first boot.ini thread. that had me rolling
- by Air Scare - at 2007.12.07 02:30:00
|
11. Compensation for Boot.ini errors!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I havent read through this particular thread, but if they do in fact go through with some form of reimbursement i hope they are careful about it and give it to people who that patch actually affected. I get the feeling that most of the naysayers...
- by Air Scare - at 2007.12.06 22:03:00
|
12. Boot.ini problems - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Robert Lewis Its all right here in the patch notes. Miscellaneous * There were rare cases of people being unable to load their client after the 2.3 patch. The cause of this has been resolved. * Several fixes relating to...
- by Air Scare - at 2007.12.06 08:33:00
|
13. Warn the players about the Issue in game before they ruin their OS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This needs to happen. The sooner the better. Theres no reason you shouldnt do this CCP. Make it happen!
- by Air Scare - at 2007.12.06 06:13:00
|
14. Warn the players about the Issue in game before they ruin their OS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Needs to be some sort of static message that doesnt leave the screen. This problem is too big to do otherwise. They need to make sure everyone in game right now KNOWS whats going on.
- by Air Scare - at 2007.12.06 06:05:00
|
15. Well Done CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Oh the irony.....
- by Air Scare - at 2007.12.06 06:02:00
|
16. Warn the players about the Issue in game before they ruin their OS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I support this, and tbh i dont see why it hasnt been done already. I would think CCP would want to "minimize casualties" in this matter. Hope they get their act together and fix this quick
- by Air Scare - at 2007.12.06 06:01:00
|
17. nationality count - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
TEXAS!!!!!
- by Air Scare - at 2007.12.04 22:41:00
|
18. Eos [Trinity] - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Dont think anyone is going to be using this "Beast" anymore. Its pretty worthless tbh. (isk wise)Even as a command ship, its warlinks suck even worse now. Still has the worst tank too.
- by Air Scare - at 2007.11.30 18:36:00
|
19. [Trinity Trailer] Full Version has landed - in My EVE [original thread]
oh. oh wow. oh yes. /me looks at his 9800 Pro 128mb "you up for this?"
- by Air Scare - at 2007.11.27 08:26:00
|
20. WTB 30 DAY GTC X 1 - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
done
- by Air Scare - at 2007.11.26 20:58:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |